Object

Planned object

Title: Archaeology anthropology history. Unconscious foundations and conscious expressions of social life

Creator:

Tabaczyński, Stanisław (1930- )

Date issued/created:

2006

Resource Type:

Article

Subtitle:

Archaeologia Polona Vol. 44 (2006)

Publisher:

Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology Polish Academy of Sciences

Place of publishing:

Warszawa

Description:

ill. ; 24 cm

Abstract:

In his paper, the author applies the thinking of Claude Lévi-Strauss to an analysis of the place of archaeology, anthropology and history as elements of broadly conceived research of the social past. The author refers to a useful proposal of Lévi-Strauss before presenting the different, not separate or contradictory, but rather complementary perspectives and research approaches of the three main disciplines studying the past. One part of the text is dedicated to the cognitive process and problems of inference, especially those under the influence of philosophy of science in the mainstream tradition of processual, postprocessual and cognitive archaeology. Particular attention is devoted to Karl Popper’s idea of World 3 as the sum of human knowledge, a product of the evolution of the species and a beautiful insight in the theory and practice of the broadly conceived historical sciences. An important topic of the paper is the relationship between the natural sciences and the humanities. At the end, the author, referring to Edward Wilson’s concept of “Deep History”, and to the EUROCORES Programme, postulates the development and amplification of cooperation between the humanities and natural sciences. The author indicates the points of Popper’s thought which can be an inspiration for archaeological reflection

References:

Ajdukiewicz, K. 1965. Logika pragmatyczna. Warszawa
Bahn, P. 1996. Archaeology: a very short introduction. Oxford
Barnard, A. 2006. Antropologia. Warszawa
Barret, J.C. and K.J. Fewster 2000. Intimacy and structural transformation: Giddens and archaeology. In Philosophy and Archaeological Practice. Perspectives for the 21st Century, C. Holtorf and H. Karlsson (eds), 25–33. Göteborg
Binford, L.R. 2001. Constructing frames of reference. An analytical method for archaeological theory building using hunter-gatherer and environmental data sets. Berkeley–Los Angeles–London
Bintliff, J. 1991. The contribution of an “Annaliste” structural history approach to archaeology. In J. Bintliff (ed.), 1–33. New York
Bintliff, J. (ed.) 1991. The “Annales” School and archaeology. New York
Bloch, M. 1954. The historians craft. Manchester
Boas, F. (ed.) 1911 (1908). Handbook of American Indian languages. Bureau of American Ethnology, 40.I
Bourdieu, P. 1977. Race, language and culture, New York
Bourdieu, P. and L.J.D. Wacquant 2001. Zaproszenie do socjologii refleksyjnej. Warszawa
Braudel, F. 1971. Historia i trwanie. Warszawa
Buchowski, M. (ed.) 1993. Amerykańska antropologia kognitywna. Poznanie, język, klasyfikacja i kultura. Warszawa
Burmeister, S. 2000. Archaeology and migration. Approaches to an archaeological proof of migration. Current Anthropology 41(4): 539–67
Carr, D. 1985. Künftige Vergangenheit. Zum Vorrang der Zeitdimension bei Husserl, Dilthey und Heidegger. In Dilthey und die Philosophie der Gegenwart, 415–36. Freiburg–München
Carr, D. 1997. Przyszła przeszłoœć. O hierarchizacji wymiarów czasu u Husserla, Diltheya i Heideggera. In Wokół rozumienia. Studia i szkice z hermeneutyki, 127–38. Kraków
Chmielewski, A. 2003. Filozofia Poppera. Analiza krytyczna. Wrocław
Cunliffe, B., W. Davies and C. Renfrew 2002. Archaeology. The widening debate. Oxford
Domańska, E. 1997. Tekstualizacja archeologii (od Barthesa do Hoddera). In Jakiej archeologii potrzebuje współczesna humanistyka?, J. Ostoja-Zagórski (ed.), 65–77. Poznań
Eggert, M.K.H. and U. Veit (eds) 1998. Theorie in der Archäologie. Zur englischsprachigen Diskussion. Tübinger Archäologische Taschenbücher 1. Münster
Fehring, G.P. 1987. Einführung in die Archäologie des Mittelalters. Darmstadt [English edition: The archaeology of Medieval Germany. An introduction. London–New York 1991]
Fernandes, S.L. De C. 1985. Foundations of objective knowledge. The relations of Popper’s theory of knowledge to that of Kant. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 86. Dordrecht–Boston Lancaster
Frege, G. 1892. Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 100: 25–50
Frege, G. 1956. The thought: a logical inquiry. Mind 65: 289–311
Frege, G. 1977. Pisma semantyczne. Warszawa
Gardin, J.-C. 1998. Cognitive issues and problem of publication in archaeology. In Theory and practice of archaeological research, W. Hensel, S. Tabaczyński and P. Urbańczyk (eds), 65–113. Warszawa
Geertz, C. 2000. Dzieło i życie. Antropolog jako autor. Warszawa
Ginzburg, C. 1983. Spie. Radici di un paradigma indiziario. In Il segno dei tre. Holmes, Dupin, Peirce, U. Eco and T.A. Sebeok (eds), 95–136. Milano
Gosden, Ch. 1999. Anthropology and archaeology. A changing relationship. London–New York
Härke, H. (ed.) 2000. Archaeology, ideology and society. The German experience. Gesellschaften und Staaten im Epochenwandel 7. Frankfurt am Main–Berlin–Bruxelles–New York–Oxford–Wien
Herzfeld, M. 2001. Anthropology. Theoretical practice in culture and society. Oxford
Herzfeld, M. 2004. Antropologia. Praktykowanie teorii w kulturze i społeczeństwie. Kraków
Hodder, I. (ed.) 2002. Archaeological theory today. Cambridge
Jochim, M.A. 1991. Archaeology as long-term ethnography. American Anthropologist 93(2): 308–21
Johnson, A.L. (ed.) 2004. Processual archaeology. Exploring analytical strategies, frames of reference, and culture process. Westport, Conecticut–London
Johnson, M. 2000. Archaeological theory. An introduction. Oxford
Jusiak, J. 1992. Filozofia nauki i teoria poznania Alfreda Whiteheada. Lublin
Klein, R. 2004. ESF Annual Report (OMLL), Strasburg
Klejn, L.S. 2001. Metaarchaeology. Acta Archaeologica Supplementa III, København
Kluckhohn, C. and A.L. Kroeber, 1972. Il concetto di cultura. Bologna
Knapp, A.B. (ed.) 1992. Archaeology, „Annales“ and ethnohistory. New directions in archaeology. Cambridge
Kobyliński, Z. (ed.) 2001. Quo vadis archaeologia? Whither European archaeology in the 21st century. Warszawa
Kołakowski, L. 2000. Kultura i fetysze. Eseje. Warszawa
Kroeber, A.L. 1973. Istota kultury. Warszawa
Labuda, G. 1957. Próba nowej systematyki i nowej interpretacji źródeł historycznych. Studia źródłoznawcze 1: 3–52
Le Goff, J. 1982. Intervista sulla storia a cura di Francesco Maiello. Roma-Bari
Le Goff, J., R. Chartier and J. Revel (eds) 1978. La nouvelle histoire. Paris
Lévi-Strauss, C. 1967. Structural anthropology. New York
Maetzke, G. 1986. Archaeological sources as an projection of the socio-cultural process [in Polish]. In Teoria i praktyka badań archeologicznych I, Przesłanki metodologiczne, W. Hensel, G. Donato, S. Tabaczyński (eds), 246–304. Wrocław
Moberg, C.A. 1976. Introduction à l’archéologie. Paris
Molino, J. 1992. Archaeology and symbols systems. In Representations in archaeology, J.-C. Gardin and Ch.S. Peebles (eds), 15–29. Bloomington-Indianapolis
Notturno, M.A. 1985. Objectivity, rationality and the Third Realm: justification and the grounds of psychologism. A study of Frege and Popper. Dordrecht-Boston-Lancaster
Pałubicka, A. and S. Tabaczyński 1986. Społeczeństwo i kultura jako przedmiot badań archeologicznych. In Teoria i praktyka badań archeologicznych I, Przesłanki metodologiczne, W. Hensel, G. Donato and S. Tabaczyński (eds), 57–183. Wrocław
Patrik, L.E. 1985. Is there an archaeological record? In Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 8, M.B. Schiffer (ed.), 27–62. New York
Peebles, Ch.S. 1991. Annalistes, hermeneutics and positivists: squaring circles or dissolving problems. In J. Bintliff (ed.), 108–24. New York
Peirce, Ch.S. 1932. Collected papers, Ch. Hartshorne and P. Weiss (eds). Cambridge
Piotrowska, D. 2004. Biskupin Ideologien Kultur. In Archeologia. Kultura. Ideologie, B. Gediga and D. Piotrowska (eds), 91–155. Biskupin–Wrocław
Pleszczyńska, E. and D. Dąbrowska 1980. On partial observability in statistical models. Mathematische Operationsforschung und Statistik. Series Statistics 11(1): 49–59
Pleszczyńska, E., M. Niewiadomska-Bugaj, J. Ćwik and J. Tyrcha. 1986. Schemi di inferenza statistica nelle ricerche archeologiche. In Teoria e pratica della ricerca archeologica, I. Premesse metodologiche, G. Donato, W. Hensel and S. Tabaczyński (eds), 325–51. Torino
Pomian, K. 2002. Archeologia, historia, naród. In Archeologia toruńska. Historia i teraźniejszożci. Materiały z konferencji naukowej zorganizowanej z okazji 140-lecia muzealnych zbiorów archeologicznych w Toruniu, 16–17 maja 2002, B. Wawrzykowska (ed.), 9–15. Toruń
Popper, K.R. 1959. The logic of scientific discovery. New York
Popper, K.R. 1972. Objective knowledge. An evolutionary approach. Oxford
Popper, K.R. 1984. Lecture in “Accademia dei Lincei” in Rome [typescript]
Popper, K.R. 1992. Wiedza obiektywna. Ewolucyjna teoria epistemologiczna. Warszawa
Renfrew, C. and P. Bahn 1991. Archaeology. Theories, methods and practice. London
Renfrew, C. and K. Boyle (eds) 2000. Archaeogenetics: DNA and population prehistory of Europe. Cambridge
Renfrew, C. and E.B.W. Zubrow (eds) 1994. The ancient mind. Elements of cognitive archaeology. Cambridge
Rossi, P. (ed.) 1970. Il concetto di cultura. I fondamenti teorici della scienza antropologica (Tylor, Boas, Lowie, Kroeber, Malinowski, Murdock, Linton, Bidney, Kluckhohn, Herskovits). Torino
Rowlands, M. 2006. Relating anthropology and archaeology. In A companion to archaeology, J. Bintliff (ed.), 473–489, Malden-Oxford-Carlton
Schnapp, A. 1996. The discovery of the past. London
Shanks, M. 1992. Experiencing the past. On the character of archaeology. London-New York
Simon, H.A. 1977. Models of discovery and other topics in the methods of science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Sciences LIV. Dordrecht-Boston
Sztompka, P. 2005. Socjologia zmian społecznych. Kraków
Tabaczyński, S. 1992. “Paradygmat poszlakowy” i problemy wnioskowania w badaniach archeologicznych. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis, Folia Archaeologica 16: 13–27
Tabaczyński, S. 1993. The indicators and the indicata: once more about problems of inference in archaeology. In Actes du XIIe Congrès International des sciences Préhistoriques et Protohistoriques, Bratislava, 1–7 septembre, J. Pavúk (ed.), 19–25. Bratislava
Tabaczyński, S. 1998. Archaeological sources: problems of identification and inference. In Theory and practice of archaeological research III, Dialogue with the data: the archaeology of complex societies and its context on the 90s, S. Tabaczyński (ed.), 33–63. Warszawa
Tabaczyński, S. 2001. Observations on the European Science Foundation Exploratory Workshop “Whither archaeology?” In Z. Kobyliński (ed.), 12–6. Warsaw
Tabaczyński, S. 2002. From the history of eastern and western archaeological thought: an introduction to discussion. In Archäologien Europas / Archaeologies of Europe. Geschichte, Methoden und Theorien / History, methods and theories. Tübinger Archäologische Taschenbücher, 67–76. Münster–New York–München –Berlin
Tabaczyński, S. 2003. Archeologia wobec szans i pułapek ponowoczesnego œwiata. Archeologia Polski 48(1–2): 234–43
Tabaczyński, S. 2004a. Constructing the past: the cognitive status of archaeological evidence. In The archaeologist: detective and thinker, L.B. Vishnyatskii, A.A. Kovalev and O.A. Shcheglova (eds), 105–13. Sankt- Peterburg
Tabaczyński, S. 2004b. Gabriella Maetzke e le Sue riflessioni metodologiche. Viterbo, in print
Tabaczyński, S. 2006. Archeologia. In Enciclopedia Italiana. Rome, in print
Tabaczyński, S. (ed.) 2000. Kultury archeologiczne a rzeczywistożć dziejowa. Warszawa
Terrenato, N. (ed.) 2000. Archeologia teorica. X Ciclo di Lezioni sulla Ricerca Applicata in Archeologia, Certosa di Pontignano (Siena), 9–14 Agosto 1999. Firenze
Thomas, J. 1996. Time, culture and identity. An interpretative archaeology. London–New York
Tilley, C. 1990. Michel Foucault: towards an archaeology of archaeology. In Reading material culture: structuralism, hermeneutics and post-structuralism, C. Tilley (ed.), 281–343. Oxford
Tilley C. (ed.) 1993. Interpretative archaeology. Oxford
Tomasello, M. 2002. Kulturowe źródła ludzkiego poznawania. Warszawa
Topolski, J. 1976. Methodology of history. Warszawa-Dordrecht
Vansina, J. 1985. Oral tradition as history. Madison
Watson, R.A. 1976. Inference in archaeology. American Antiquity 41: 58–66
Whitehead, A.N. 1964. The concept of Nature. Cambridge
Whitehead, A.N. 1987. Nauka i œwiat nowożytny. Kraków
Whitehead, A.N. 1988. Nauka i œwiat współczesny. Warszawa
Willer, D.E. 1967. Scientific sociology: theory and methods. Englewood Cliffs
Willer, D.E. and M. Webster 1970. Theoretical concepts and observables. American Sociological Review 35(4): 748–56
Wilson, E.O. 1990. Deep history. Chronicles 14: 16–8
Wilson, E.O. 1998. Consilience. The unity of knowledge. New York
Wilson, E.O. 2002. Konsiliencja. Jedność nauki. Poznań
Wright, R. 2005. NONZERO. Logika ludzkiego przeznaczenia. Warszawa
Wylie, A. 2000. Questions of evidence, legitimacy, and the (dis)unity of science. American Antiquity 65(2): 227–37
Wylie, A. 2002. Thinking from things. Essays in the philosophy of archaeology. Berkeley
Zalewska, A. 2005. Teoria źródła archeologicznego i historycznego we współczesnej refleksji metodologicznej. Lublin

Relation:

Archaeologia Polona

Volume:

44

Start page:

15

End page:

39

Format:

application/octet-stream

Resource Identifier:

0066-5924

Source:

IAiE PAN, call no. P 357 ; IAiE PAN, call no. P 358 ; IAiE PAN, call no. P 356 ; click here to follow the link

Language:

eng

Terms of use:

Copyright-protected material. May be used within the limits of statutory user freedoms

Digitizing institution:

Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Original in:

Library of the Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Edition name Date

This page uses 'cookies'. More information